Peer Towers

Even if we agree that members of the art world have the power to make any artifacts works of art, they must have reasons for making some artifacts art and not others. If they don’t have any logic behind what they do, then why should the category ofart have interest for us? If they do have reasons, then these are what determine whether or not something is art.

“Es ist ohnehin nicht zufassen, dass ich eigentlich keine Ahnung habe wer ich bin, was Kunst ist oder was die Malerei bedeuted, ich sitze dann deshalb ziemlich scheiss dumm und verzweifelt in die ganze Geschichte mitte drin.”

Analysis of these reasons would be far more interesting and informative than empty institutional theory; if we could identify these reasons, then theory would be unnecessary although it reminds us that what makes something a work of art is a cultural matter, dependent on social institutions at particular times rather than on some timeless canon.

Nice Sofa, 2009

ptowers@hrc.ac.uk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s